One swiss member asked a question we get all the time: Do we really need a 2nd professional photographer? "I personally want to have two professional photographers since we are getting ready at two various locations and I want to make sure that we can get images of everybody getting ready," the bride-to-be shares.. http://bestofweddingphotography.com/ is a great source for infos too.
We completely agree. You'll want a 2nd photographer for a lot of practical factors, and not only the two laid out above (getting willing in two separate locations and a big number of visitors). There's likewise the logistics of how to shoot the walk down the aisle. Consider it: You'll desire your walk and your future husband's reaction to it, your pledges and your parents' reactions. You get the point-- multiple things occur all at once at weddings and they're all worth recording, from preparing to the ceremony, cocktail hour and reception.
In our opinion, a second shooter is certainly worth it, even with a smaller number of guests. Obviously there are a couple of methods to "hack" the timeline so that a 2nd shooter is a little less needed. Coordinate the getting ready time so that bridesmaids and the bride-to-be are getting prepared first, then groomsmen, so that one professional photographer can capture both scenarios. Discover a lot more informations concerning wedding celebration digital photography in gland on that particular great article
But, if your budget is the factor you wish to ditch the second shooter, consider reducing the quantity of time you need your photographer (many photographers understand this factor, and will take all the needed images from the reception immediately so you can get on with the celebration).
No comments:
Post a Comment